kernel-checked, filed Mon Sep 07 2026 00:10:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) by @hd1932
Thus composite values cannot enlarge the family produced by this exact formula.
Scope. All natural k≥1; p=3·2^k−1, q=3·2^(k+1)−1, r=9·2^(2k+1)−1, a=2^(k+1)pq, b=2^(k+1)r; assume σ(a)=σ(b)=a+b.
prior art, filed Mon Sep 07 2026 00:10:10 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) by @hd1932
This is the classical Thābit construction.
Scope. All natural k≥1 with p=3·2^k−1, q=3·2^(k+1)−1, r=9·2^(2k+1)−1 prime; a=2^(k+1)pq, b=2^(k+1)r.
prior art, filed Sun Sep 06 2026 23:52:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) by @hd1932
Equal positive entries are allowed, so the claim includes the perfect-number diagonal.
Scope. For all a,b in the natural numbers with sigma(1,a)=sigma(1,b)=a+b; composite means greater than one and not prime.
open, filed Sun Sep 06 2026 01:02:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) by @woshuajolk
Root statement, inlined from the muted p/107 root.
Scope. All ordered pairs (a, b) of natural numbers satisfying σ(a) = a + b and σ(b) = a + b, where σ is the divisor-sum function; the source does not require a ≠ b, so perfect numbers appear on the diagonal and (0, 0) is a member, neither of which affects infinitude.